Mercury – Not what the scientists are telling you
They are not lying, They just don’t know. Mercury is symptomatic of the complete bankruptcy of modern planetary science.
The ‘planet’ Mercury is the former core of a planet which left the vicinity of the Earth only 2690 years ago. I call that no-longer-intact planet priori-Mars. 6000 years ago it was a living planet with abundant water, atmosphere, and life.
From about 4000 to 687 BC this planet interacted closely with the Earth. During this period the more massive Earth captured practically all the atmosphere and water from that planet. This fell to Earth along with much organic material, called manna, ambrosia or haoma. After all the volatiles were captured by the Earth, priori-Mars split into two portions, the solid core exited through its mantle, through the great gash now called the Valles Marineris, and went into the inner solar system to become what astrophysicists believe is a complete ‘planet’ Mercury. The mantle along with a portion of its liquid core contracted as it drifted out to become what the astrophysicists now believe is the complete ‘planet’ Mars.
The people who lived throughout the Bronze and Iron ages observed the planet Mercury, and called it Hermes, Hathor and Mercury. It glowed blue then red as it first appeared through the Valles Marineris, only 33,000 km from the Earth. At which times it was referred to as ‘the eye of Horus or Ra,’ and inspired the Greek myth of the cyclops, the one-eyed race of iron workers. The parallel grooves scratched on its surface by the rocks surrounding the Valles Marineris, were interpreted as the string of a lute, associated with Hermes. A comparison of the hieroglyph of the ‘eye of Horus’ exactly matches the canyons which surround the Valles Marineris and the parallel lines gouged on the surface of Mercury, now called the Mercurian grid, are the strings of Hermes’ lute.
The pristine surface of Mercury has become covered with innumerable rocks and dust blasted from the northern third of priori-Mars during its interactions with the Earth – the same regolith that covers the near side of the Moon. The flat-bottomed craters on the surface of Mercury reveal that it is primarily solid iron, because the impacts could not penetrate the actual surface.
Mercury reveals another misconception of modern astrophysicists, who currently believe that the internal magnetic fields of terrestrail planets are generated by the ponderous circulation of liquid iron in their outer cores, between the solid core and the mantle. Since Mercury has a dipole magnetic field, they claim that it ‘must have’ at least a liquid layer or core. But the fact that Mercury was the solid core of priori-Mars, proves that the internal fields are generated by supercurrents within the solid cores. The solid cores are slightly less dense than pure iron (nickel-iron). I maintain that they comprise FeH, which is known to form a layered mineral – one that could likely become a superconductor under the high pressures within a planet. The superconducting state within Mercury probably retreated to greater depths once the required pressure of the overburden was removed, thus accounting for its diminished strength relative to that required to have formed the strong permanent magnetism in Martian rocks, the source of which is now absent.
The truth is revealed at firmament-chaos.com.
| And I said to my Spirit, When we become the enfolders of those orbs, and the pleasure and knowledge of everything in them, shall we be fill’d and satisfied then? | |
| And my Spirit said, No, we but level that life, to pass and continue beyond. Walt Whitman |
